Questions Considered

Notes on thinking, learning, decision making, and occasionally running. Simple ideas, mostly obvious.

David B. Resnik and Mohammad Hosseini on the negative impact of AI-generated content in scientific publishing:

Generative AI is flooding scientific research with quick and easy text, figures, and citations that are either partially inaccurate or wholly false—and very difficult to detect.

Science’s overtaxed academic publishing system and its publish-or-perish work culture have long provided fertile ground for content mills and predatory presses.

AI systematizes intellectual dishonesty, transforming it from a collection of individual misdeeds into a thriving industrial pipeline, threatening both science and society.

The Vicious Spiral of AI Slop

Discover more from Questions Considered

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading